? Explanation of report features   View original ACBLscore output
Download hands in PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
EVENT>Mon. Aft. Pr. (I)        |SESSION>Monday Aft   |SECTION> I
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 25, 2019  |CLUB NO.>255315    | 02/25/2019 16:56
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Exum, Carole S. |RATING>Club Championship (70%, 60%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>200/100/50     |CLUB>Bridge R Us
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=6/C=5                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Carol Harris           Susan Wingard            A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     34.68  48.17          
 2 Mary Ann Crawford      Beth High                C   2     2     2   |   2     2     2     42.15  58.54  0.65(OA)
 3 Barbara Van Vliet      Margie Pearsall          A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     26.84  37.28          
 4 Ann Gold               Sarah Weeks              C   1     1     1   |   1     1     1     43.16  59.94  0.87(OA)
 5 Reuben IV Thompson     Ben Anderson             C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     36.00  50.00          
 6 Davey Fulmer           Janice Rich              C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     31.67  43.99          
 7 Susan Wilkinson        Debbie McGowan           C   3     .     .   |   3     .     .     37.51  52.10  0.49(OA)
 8 Bob Smith              Fay Lindquist            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     35.99  49.99          
                                          Totals                                            288.00       

Hands and Results
1 ♠-
Q98642
Q987
♣K62
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠9763
T3
AKT64
♣83
♠AJ4
KJ
J532
♣Q974
♠KQT852
A75
-
♣AJT5
7
712
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 3♠ 1NT  ♦6
EW: -/1  ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥1 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  3 N +1   ♣4  4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
  140          2.00   1.00  3 N      ♣9  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
  110          1.00   2.00  2♠ S      A  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
  100          0.00   3.00  3 E -2   ♠K  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
2 ♠QT976
7542
8765
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AJ2
QT983
A
♣QJ98
♠K3
J6
KQJ9432
♣T7
♠854
AK
T
♣AK65432
2
1410
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT4
EW: 3 1 3NT  ♣5 ♠4/5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  5 E -2   A  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
  100          2.50   0.50  5 E -2   ♣A  4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
        110    0.50   2.50  3 E      A  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
        110    0.50   2.50  3 E      A  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
3 ♠986
KJ
T8
♣J76542
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AKJ2
AQT74
Q95
♣Q
♠QT3
6
K7642
♣KT93
♠754
98532
AJ3
♣A8
5
188
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT4
EW: 2♣ 4 3 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  5♠ W -2   T  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
         80    2.00   1.00  1 W      ♣5  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
        110    1.00   2.00  2 W      8  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
        630    0.00   3.00  3N E +1   ♠4  4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
4 ♠87
AKJ42
K8643
♣8
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠JT3
87
QJ52
♣9754
♠K42
T65
A7
♣AKQJ3
♠AQ965
Q93
T9
♣T62
11
417
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4 2/1♠  ♣4 NT6
EW: 2♣  ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  3 N +1   ♣A  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
  140          1.50   1.50  3 N      ♣A  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
  140          1.50   1.50  2 N +1   ♣8  4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
  100          0.00   3.00  2♣ E -1   ♠A  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
5 ♠AKQ93
97
AQ76
♣A8
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠872
4
KJT93
♣KQ54
♠J654
AQT865
-
♣976
♠T
KJ32
8542
♣JT32
19
97
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 1 1/-♠ 2NT  ♠7/6
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  2N* W -2  ♠A  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
  100          2.00   1.00  3 E -2   ♠T  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
   50          1.00   2.00  2 E -1   ♠T  1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
        200    0.00   3.00  2♠ N -2   ♣7  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
6 ♠AQT
QJ6
Q9754
♣65
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠876
K95
A82
♣A982
♠KJ532
A2
KT3
♣JT4
♠94
T8743
J6
♣KQ73
11
1112
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
EW: 4♣ 2 2 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4♠ E -1   ♣K  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
        120    2.00   1.00  1N W +1   5  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ E +1   T  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
        170    0.00   3.00  3♠ E +1   ♣3  1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
7 ♠AQJ65
9874
Q
♣A42
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠9
AKT62
T6542
♣K6
♠K43
-
AKJ93
♣JT753
♠T872
QJ53
87
♣Q98
13
1012
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣4/3 ♦2 ♥5 NT4
EW: 3♣ 5 2 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -600 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  3N E -3   ♠2  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
        130    2.00   1.00  3 E +1   ♠T  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
        150    1.00   2.00  4 E +1   ♠8  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
        910    0.00   3.00  4* E +1  ♠2  1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
8 ♠A742
98
AQJ4
♣K94
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠QT98
A65
83
♣T653
♠K6
KT7
KT952
♣A82
♠J53
QJ432
76
♣QJ7
14
613
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2 1/- 1♠ 2/1NT
       ♥7/6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   80          3.00   0.00  1♠ N      5  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
   50          2.00   1.00  2 E -1   2  1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
         50    1.00   2.00  2♠ N -1   ♣2  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
        150    0.00   3.00  2 S -3   ♠8  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
9 ♠AK52
A985
QJT3
♣6
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠87
643
54
♣AT9732
♠QJ6
QT2
K98
♣KQJ8
♠T943
KJ7
A762
♣54
14
414
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 5 5 5♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +450 5♠-NS/5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.83   0.17  3♣ W -3   ♠A  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
  170          1.50   1.50  3♠ S +1   ♠7  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
  110          0.17   2.83  1♠ S +1   ♠7  1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
10 ♠3
A765
T9653
♣765
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AJ952
T842
K8
♣83
♠KT87
KQ3
Q2
♣KJT9
♠Q64
J9
AJ74
♣AQ42
4
814
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1 3♠  ♣6 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.17   0.83  4♠ E -1   A  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
  100          2.17   0.83  2♠ E -1   J  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
        110    0.17   2.83  2♠ W      5  1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
11 ♠T7
T732
K93
♣QJ62
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AJ2
A95
A762
♣AT7
♠Q84
K84
JT854
♣K5
♠K9653
QJ6
Q
♣9843
6
179
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3
EW: 1♣ 5/4 3 2♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.83   0.17  3N W -1   ♣2  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
        430    1.50   1.50  3N W +1   ♣6  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
        490    0.17   2.83  3N W +3   ♣2  1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
12 ♠AT53
KJT92
Q864
♣-
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠-
AQ8754
KJ92
♣K82
♠KQ862
3
T3
♣AJT63
♠J974
6
A75
♣Q9754
10
1310
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥6 NT6
EW: 2♣ -/1 1/2 1NT
       ♦6/7 ♠5/6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -110 2-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  4 W -3   ♠T  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
  100          1.50   1.50  2* W -1  4  1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
        110    0.17   2.83  3♣ E      6  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
13 ♠942
862
AQJT3
♣K3
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠K876
K54
K652
♣A5
♠AJ5
AJ973
74
♣J92
♠QT3
QT
98
♣QT8764
10
1311
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 2 2♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.50   0.50  4 E -2   ♣7  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
  200          2.50   0.50  4 E -2   ♣7  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
  100          1.00   2.00  4 E -1   9  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
         90    0.00   3.00  1N E      ♣8  2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
14 ♠KQJ
AJ65
A6
♣AQJ2
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠852
K832
Q8
♣K974
♠A963
9
K7532
♣T83
♠T74
QT74
JT94
♣65
22
87
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 4 2♠ 3NT
EW:
       ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥2/3 ♠4/5 NT3/4
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          3.00   0.00  3N N      3  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
  150          2.00   1.00  2N N +1   2  2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
  120          1.00   2.00  2N N      7  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
         50    0.00   3.00  3N N -1   3  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
15 ♠5
9543
AJ72
♣AQ92
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T9863
KT
T954
♣63
♠QJ2
AQJ62
Q
♣KT84
♠AK74
87
K863
♣J75
11
315
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1NT  ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2N N +1   ♠Q  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
  100          2.00   1.00  2 E -2   3  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
        110    0.50   2.50  1 E +1   ♠A  2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
        110    0.50   2.50  1 E +1   ♠A  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
16 ♠A853
J543
J3
♣A32
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠QJ4
-
KQ742
♣KT765
♠96
AKT86
9865
♣QJ
♠KT72
Q972
AT
♣984
10
1110
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1 1♠
       ♣3/4 ♦3/4 ♥6/7 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3 1NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -110 3-EW/3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  1♠ S +2   4  2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
        110    2.00   1.00  2 W +1   ♠8  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
        130    0.50   2.50  3 W +1   5  7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
        130    0.50   2.50  2 W +2   5  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
17 ♠T73
4
Q872
♣AQT83
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠5
KQ53
KJT93
♣K97
♠AK842
A9872
A6
♣6
♠QJ96
JT6
54
♣J542
8
1215
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT2
EW: 5 6 3/4♠ 2/5NT  ♣5/6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -980 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.83   0.17  3 E +1   ♠Q  4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
        480    0.83   2.17  4 E +2   ♠9  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
        480    0.83   2.17  4 E +2   ♣4  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
18 ♠K87
T95
Q3
♣76542
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠63
K42
AK986
♣QT3
♠Q954
AQ87
JT2
♣A9
♠AJT2
J63
754
♣KJ8
5
1213
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3
EW: 1♣ 5/4 4 2♠ 4/3NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.83   0.17  3 E      6  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
        130    1.50   1.50  2 E +2   ♣8  4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
        400    0.17   2.83  3N E      ♠2  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
19 ♠AKQ92
KT3
T8
♣Q82
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J3
762
KJ62
♣AT76
♠T75
J94
AQ743
♣43
♠864
AQ85
95
♣KJ95
14
97
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 4♠ 1NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♥1 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.83   0.17  4♠ N      ♣4  4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
  230          1.50   1.50  3♠ N +3   ♣4  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
  170          0.17   2.83  2♠ N +2   ♣4  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
20 ♠AQ8752
J
8
♣QJ543
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KT9
A982
52
♣A872
♠3
QT53
AJT63
♣T96
♠J64
K764
KQ974
♣K
10
117
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT6
EW: 2 2 1NT  ♣6 ♠4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.83   0.17  2♠ N +1   ♣T  4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
  110          1.50   1.50  2♠ N      ♣T  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
        200    0.17   2.83  4♠ N -2   ♣T  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
21 ♠JT32
AKJ
953
♣532
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AKQ4
5
A76
♣KJ874
♠95
Q984
KQJ82
♣Q6
♠876
T7632
T4
♣AT9
9
1710
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
EW: 5♣ 5 2 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW/5-EW/5♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.83   0.17  2 E +2   ♠8  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
        150    1.50   1.50  2♣ W +3   A  2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
        400    0.17   2.83  3N W      J  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
22 ♠J8
K752
KQ654
♣A3
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠Q93
QJ4
J32
♣T952
♠A7654
T83
A87
♣K6
♠KT2
A96
T9
♣QJ874
13
611
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3 2NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣3 ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.83   0.17  3 N -1   ♠5  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
        100    0.83   2.17  2N S -2   ♠3  2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
        100    0.83   2.17  4 N -2   ♠A  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
23 ♠94
QJ965
AQ3
♣J95
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AQJ3
K8
T6
♣KQT73
♠-
AT73
K98542
♣862
♠KT87652
42
J7
♣A4
10
157
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4 2 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.83   0.17  2♠ S -1   ♣K  2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
        180    1.50   1.50  2N W +2   ♠4  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
        300    0.17   2.83  3♠ S -3   ♣7  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
24 ♠QT9542
42
7654
♣7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠76
QJ83
T8
♣K9532
♠J83
AT9
K92
♣AQT4
♠AK
K765
AQJ3
♣J86
2
614
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 5♠  ♣5 ♥5 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2 1NT  ♦3 ♠2
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  3 W -3   4  2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
         90    1.50   1.50  2♣ E      ♠A  8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
        150    0.17   2.83  1N S -3   ♣3  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
25 ♠KQJ876
AK
K
♣AT32
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AT9
Q76542
A76
♣K
♠4
JT8
T98543
♣Q96
♠532
93
QJ2
♣J8754
20
133
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT  ♦5 ♥5
EW: 2 2  ♣4 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.83   0.17  4 W -2   ♠J  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
  170          0.83   2.17  3♠ N +1   J  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
  170          0.83   2.17  1♠ N +3   T  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
26 ♠A843
5
AQ6
♣QJ854
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠KT52
AQ43
8
♣AT63
♠QJ6
K762
7432
♣72
♠97
JT98
KJT95
♣K9
13
136
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♥5 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2 1♠  ♣4/5 ♦4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  2 E -1   5  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
        100    1.50   1.50  3N S -1   3  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
        110    0.17   2.83  2 E      ♠9  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
27 ♠AJ65
JT52
T95
♣K2
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠874
A976
AK8
♣J86
♠KT3
Q84
J73
♣AT54
♠Q92
K3
Q642
♣Q973
9
1210
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2/1♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♦6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
    PASS       2.17   0.83  Pass Out      3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
    PASS       2.17   0.83  Pass Out      5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
         80    0.17   2.83  1 W      T  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
28 ♠43
KT86
AJ3
♣A642
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠J872
Q42
K86
♣QT9
♠AQT965
753
Q954
♣-
♠K
AJ9
T72
♣KJ8753
12
88
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 3 1NT  ♠5
EW: 2♠  ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          2.83   0.17  4♣ N      4  6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
   50          0.83   2.17  5♠ E -1   ♣7  3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
   50          0.83   2.17  3♠ E -1   ♣J  5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks