Hands and Results
1 |
♠-
♥Q98642
♦Q987
♣K62
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠9763
♥T3
♦AKT64
♣83
|
♠AJ4
♥KJ
♦J532
♣Q974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥1 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♣4 4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N ♣9 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S ♦A 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ E -2 ♠K 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
|
2 |
♠QT976
♥7542
♦8765
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AJ2
♥QT983
♦A
♣QJ98
|
♠K3
♥J6
♦KQJ9432
♣T7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 5♦ E -2 ♥A 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
100 2.50 0.50 5♦ E -2 ♣A 4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ E ♥A 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ E ♥A 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
3 |
♠986
♥KJ
♦T8
♣J76542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKJ2
♥AQT74
♦Q95
♣Q
|
♠QT3
♥6
♦K7642
♣KT93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5♠ W -2 ♦T 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
80 2.00 1.00 1♥ W ♣5 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦8 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
630 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠4 4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
|
4 |
♠87
♥AKJ42
♦K8643
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠JT3
♥87
♦QJ52
♣9754
|
♠K42
♥T65
♦A7
♣AKQJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♣A 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ N ♣A 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♣8 4-Gold-Weeks vs 2-Crawford-High
100 0.00 3.00 2♣ E -1 ♠A 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
5 |
♠AKQ93
♥97
♦AQ76
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠872
♥4
♦KJT93
♣KQ54
|
♠J654
♥AQT865
♦-
♣976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2N* W -2 ♠A 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♠T 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠T 1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
200 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 ♣7 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
|
6 |
♠AQT
♥QJ6
♦Q9754
♣65
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠876
♥K95
♦A82
♣A982
|
♠KJ532
♥A2
♦KT3
♣JT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣K 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
120 2.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♦5 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥T 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♣3 1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
|
7 |
♠AQJ65
♥9874
♦Q
♣A42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠9
♥AKT62
♦T6542
♣K6
|
♠K43
♥-
♦AKJ93
♣JT753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4/3 ♦2 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♠2 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♠T 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
150 1.00 2.00 4♦ E +1 ♠8 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
910 0.00 3.00 4♦* E +1 ♠2 1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
|
8 |
♠A742
♥98
♦AQJ4
♣K94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠QT98
♥A65
♦83
♣T653
|
♠K6
♥KT7
♦KT952
♣A82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 1♠ 2/1NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 3.00 0.00 1♠ N ♦5 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 2-Crawford-High
50 2.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 ♥2 1-Harris-Wingard vs 4-Gold-Weeks
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♣2 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
150 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -3 ♠8 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
|
9 |
♠AK52
♥A985
♦QJT3
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠87
♥643
♦54
♣AT9732
|
♠QJ6
♥QT2
♦K98
♣KQJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3♣ W -3 ♠A 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♠7 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
110 0.17 2.83 1♠ S +1 ♠7 1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
|
10 |
♠3
♥A765
♦T9653
♣765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AJ952
♥T842
♦K8
♣83
|
♠KT87
♥KQ3
♦Q2
♣KJT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 4♠ E -1 ♦A 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
100 2.17 0.83 2♠ E -1 ♥J 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ W ♥5 1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
|
11 |
♠T7
♥T732
♦K93
♣QJ62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AJ2
♥A95
♦A762
♣AT7
|
♠Q84
♥K84
♦JT854
♣K5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3N W -1 ♣2 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
430 1.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♣6 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
490 0.17 2.83 3N W +3 ♣2 1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
|
12 |
♠AT53
♥KJT92
♦Q864
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠-
♥AQ8754
♦KJ92
♣K82
|
♠KQ862
♥3
♦T3
♣AJT63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♦ 1/2♥ 1NT ♦6/7 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 4♥ W -3 ♠T 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall
100 1.50 1.50 2♥* W -1 ♦4 1-Harris-Wingard vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
110 0.17 2.83 3♣ E ♥6 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 4-Gold-Weeks
|
13 |
♠942
♥862
♦AQJT3
♣K3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠K876
♥K54
♦K652
♣A5
|
♠AJ5
♥AJ973
♦74
♣J92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♣7 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♣7 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♦9 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
90 0.00 3.00 1N E ♣8 2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
14 |
♠KQJ
♥AJ65
♦A6
♣AQJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠852
♥K832
♦Q8
♣K974
|
♠A963
♥9
♦K7532
♣T83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥2/3 ♠4/5 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♦3 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
150 2.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♦2 2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
120 1.00 2.00 2N N ♦7 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
50 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♦3 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
|
15 |
♠5
♥9543
♦AJ72
♣AQ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠T9863
♥KT
♦T954
♣63
|
♠QJ2
♥AQJ62
♦Q
♣KT84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♠Q 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
100 2.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 ♦3 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
110 0.50 2.50 1♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
110 0.50 2.50 1♥ E +1 ♠A 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
|
16 |
♠A853
♥J543
♦J3
♣A32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠QJ4
♥-
♦KQ742
♣KT765
|
♠96
♥AKT86
♦9865
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ 1♠ ♣3/4 ♦3/4 ♥6/7 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 1♠ S +2 ♦4 2-Crawford-High vs 1-Harris-Wingard
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ W +1 ♠8 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 4-Gold-Weeks
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ W +1 ♥5 7-Wilkinson-McGowan vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
130 0.50 2.50 2♦ W +2 ♥5 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
|
17 |
♠T73
♥4
♦Q872
♣AQT83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠5
♥KQ53
♦KJT93
♣K97
|
♠AK842
♥A9872
♦A6
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 6♥ 3/4♠ 2/5NT ♣5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♥ E +1 ♠Q 4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
480 0.83 2.17 4♥ E +2 ♠9 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
480 0.83 2.17 4♥ E +2 ♣4 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
|
18 |
♠K87
♥T95
♦Q3
♣76542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠63
♥K42
♦AK986
♣QT3
|
♠Q954
♥AQ87
♦JT2
♣A9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5/4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 3♦ E ♥6 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +2 ♣8 4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
400 0.17 2.83 3N E ♠2 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
|
19 |
♠AKQ92
♥KT3
♦T8
♣Q82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠J3
♥762
♦KJ62
♣AT76
|
♠T75
♥J94
♦AQ743
♣43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥1 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ N ♣4 4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
230 1.50 1.50 3♠ N +3 ♣4 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
170 0.17 2.83 2♠ N +2 ♣4 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
|
20 |
♠AQ8752
♥J
♦8
♣QJ543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KT9
♥A982
♦52
♣A872
|
♠3
♥QT53
♦AJT63
♣T96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ N +1 ♣T 4-Gold-Weeks vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♣T 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 5-Thompson-Anderson
200 0.17 2.83 4♠ N -2 ♣T 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 2-Crawford-High
|
21 |
♠JT32
♥AKJ
♦953
♣532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKQ4
♥5
♦A76
♣KJ874
|
♠95
♥Q984
♦KQJ82
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 2♦ E +2 ♠8 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
150 1.50 1.50 2♣ W +3 ♥A 2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
400 0.17 2.83 3N W ♥J 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
|
22 |
♠J8
♥K752
♦KQ654
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q93
♥QJ4
♦J32
♣T952
|
♠A7654
♥T83
♦A87
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♦ N -1 ♠5 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
100 0.83 2.17 2N S -2 ♠3 2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
100 0.83 2.17 4♥ N -2 ♠A 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
23 |
♠94
♥QJ965
♦AQ3
♣J95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJ3
♥K8
♦T6
♣KQT73
|
♠-
♥AT73
♦K98542
♣862
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2♠ S -1 ♣K 2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
180 1.50 1.50 2N W +2 ♠4 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
300 0.17 2.83 3♠ S -3 ♣7 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
24 |
♠QT9542
♥42
♦7654
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠76
♥QJ83
♦T8
♣K9532
|
♠J83
♥AT9
♦K92
♣AQT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♥ W -3 ♦4 2-Crawford-High vs 7-Wilkinson-McGowan
90 1.50 1.50 2♣ E ♠A 8-Smith-Lindquist vs 6-Fulmer-Rich
150 0.17 2.83 1N S -3 ♣3 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
25 |
♠KQJ876
♥AK
♦K
♣AT32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT9
♥Q76542
♦A76
♣K
|
♠4
♥JT8
♦T98543
♣Q96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 4♥ W -2 ♠J 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
170 0.83 2.17 3♠ N +1 ♥J 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
170 0.83 2.17 1♠ N +3 ♦T 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
|
26 |
♠A843
♥5
♦AQ6
♣QJ854
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠KT52
♥AQ43
♦8
♣AT63
|
♠QJ6
♥K762
♦7432
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2♥ E -1 ♦5 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
100 1.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♥3 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
110 0.17 2.83 2♥ E ♠9 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
|
27 |
♠AJ65
♥JT52
♦T95
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠874
♥A976
♦AK8
♣J86
|
♠KT3
♥Q84
♦J73
♣AT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.17 0.83 Pass Out 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
PASS 2.17 0.83 Pass Out 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
80 0.17 2.83 1♥ W ♦T 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
|
28 |
♠43
♥KT86
♦AJ3
♣A642
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠J872
♥Q42
♦K86
♣QT9
|
♠AQT965
♥753
♦Q954
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 4♣ N ♦4 6-Fulmer-Rich vs 2-Crawford-High
50 0.83 2.17 5♠ E -1 ♣7 3-Van Vliet-Pearsall vs 1-Harris-Wingard
50 0.83 2.17 3♠ E -1 ♣J 5-Thompson-Anderson vs 4-Gold-Weeks
|